concept of knowledge: dialogical, subjective, fluid and porous frame.
INTRODUCTION
Knowledge is acquired by
senses, particularly by observation and experimentation. Once, knowledge was
considered to be a ‘priori’ phenomenon, or based on reason. But now, knowledge
is considered as ‘posteriori’ phenomenon which is observed through observation
and experimentation. The term knowledge also means ‘empirical evidence’, ‘data’
as well as ‘sense experience’.
DEFINITION OF KNOWLEDGE
According to Swami
Vivekananda, “Knowledge is to find out unity in the midst of diversity- to establish
unity among things which appear to be different to be other”
According to Plato,
“Knowledge is true opinion combind with reason. That is, for which the claimant
to knowledge can give adequategrounds or rational justification”
According to Webster,
“Knowledge is that what is known, that which is preserved by knowing or that
familiarity which is gained by actual experiences”
In brief, knowledge is
defined as “Knowledge is ‘why’, ‘what’ and ‘how’ of a fact”.
CONCEPT OF
KNOWLEDGE – DIALOGICAL
Dialogical
learning is learning that takes place through dialogue. A dialogical theory of
knowledge is based on the ego-alter interaction argues that knowledge is
co-constructed joinly by the ego-alter. Dialogical theory brings communication
into the centre of the theory of knowledge. According to this concept of
knowledge, “Knowledge consruction is a dialogical or interactive endeavor”
Dialogical teaching
harness the power of talk to stimulate and extend pupil’s thinking and advance
their learning and understanding. Dialogue approaches to classroom practice are
contrasted with monologue approaches which dominate classroom practice in many
parts of the world. Dialogue teaching reflects a view that knowledge and
understanding come from testing evidence, analyzing ideas and exploring values,
rather than unquestioningly accepting somebody else certainties.
PRINCIPLES OF
DIALOGICAL TEACHING
The principles
of dialogic teachings are as follows. They are
v Knowledge
is not fixed.
v The
dialogue between different perspectives leads to new understanding and new
knowledge.
v The
teachers and students fully engage in learning in an environment where these
differences are respected and rigorously exploited.
v Learning
through dialogue leads not only to content knowledge but improved thinking
skills.
SUBJECTIVE
KNOWLEDGE
Subjective refers to the
feelings and experiences that depend on individuals own particular view points
and traits. The subjective view of knowledge and understanding might be
contrasted with the objective realistic view. Subjective experience can be
viewed as data in need of explanation. The closer the subjective is inspected,
the former and less interpreted it appears, the more it becomes like data.the
objective view gains much of uts force because it can be shared by different
people, but subjective knowledge is defined as the knowledge that is possessed
by the individual and that no others have access to.
FLUID AND POROUS
FRAME
This
figure shows the relatiomship between curriculum and it’s broad socio political
context. From the shared perspectives of an LLC (Language, Literature,Culture)
framework, curriculum is viewed as a result of the tension between various
ideologies and the conscious actions undertaken by the cultural workers at the centre
of the diagram namely by teachers , students and the communities of which they
are part. The largest area represents the context of education and curriculum
and includes culture particularly the language in which the literary practices
through which education occurs. “A fluid
mix of frame experience, values, contextual information and expert insights
that provides a framework for evaluating and incorporating new experiences and
information”. According to Michael Apple, “Curriculum is never neutral”. On the contrary, the curriculum
selected by the schools, and implemented by teachers can powerfully impact the
lives of students including their life chances.
Multicultural
education, viewed comprehensively and critically is a persistant remainder to
educators and researchers that we cannot leave the marginalized, the most
vulnerable and the most improvished of students languishing while theories toss
around heady semantics that take no action towards social change. Likewise,
postmodernism with its focus on questioning boundaries and disarming grand
narrative remainder multicultural educators that identities and cultural instincts
are fluid and porous and that relationships to knowledge and truth are
unstable.
CONCLUSION
All
knowledge is a claim to be true, but the claim can be incorrect. It can be
implicit or explicit, it can be more or less formal or systematic. All the
scientific knowledge is provisional, not a claim of absolute truth.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Suma, S. (2016). Understanding disciplines and subjects. Trichy
: Akshaya publishers.
Retrieved from
Ganesan, P. (2016). Course material for B.Ed. Chennai :
TNTEU.
Comments
Post a Comment